Question 1
A National Party pamphlet from 1948 claims apartheid is needed because Black South Africans threaten White jobs and cities. A historian argues the deeper purpose was to guarantee a supply of controllable cheap labour for White-owned mines and farms. Which interpretation does this historian's argument most closely resemble?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Identify the claim being tested
The historian argues apartheid's deeper purpose was to secure cheap, controllable Black labour for White industry, not merely to protect jobs as the pamphlet states.
Step 2: Match to the historiography table
Beinart's Marxist interpretation explicitly argues apartheid was fundamentally an economic system securing cheap labour, with racial ideology serving that material interest.
Step 3: Distinguish from other historians
Thompson emphasises the scale of the legal system, and Welsh emphasises Afrikaner ethnic survival, neither of which centres labour exploitation as the primary driver.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The scenario's emphasis on cheap labour for mines and farms matches Beinart's economic/Marxist framework precisely.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Eliminate Thompson
Thompson's focus is on the comprehensiveness of apartheid's legal machinery, not on economic motives for labour control.
Step 2: Eliminate Welsh
Welsh centres Afrikaner nationalism and fear of losing political dominance, not the economic exploitation of labour.
Step 3: Eliminate Biko/Black Consciousness
Biko's movement addressed psychological liberation from internalised inferiority, an unrelated framework to economic causation.
Step 4: Select Beinart
Only the Marxist/economic interpretation directly explains apartheid through the lens of securing cheap, controlled labour.
Question 2
Which government policy shift is most accurately used as evidence that apartheid's system of control was deliberately extended from regulating male labour to comprehensive surveillance of the entire Black population?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Identify what the question asks
The question asks which policy shows control expanding beyond regulating male labour into comprehensive surveillance of the whole population.
Step 2: Recall the 1956 extension
Pass laws originally targeted Black men because the migrant labour system primarily needed male workers; extending passes to women in 1956 moved beyond labour control to total surveillance.
Step 3: Assess the other options
Classification, facility segregation and marriage bans all served different specific purposes (sorting, everyday separation, and preventing intimacy) rather than illustrating an expansion from labour control to full surveillance.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The 1956 extension to women is the clearest example of control expanding beyond its original labour-focused justification.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Eliminate Population Registration Act
This Act established racial categories but did not itself represent an expansion of an existing labour-control mechanism to a new group.
Step 2: Eliminate Reservation of Separate Amenities Act
This law governed everyday public facilities, unrelated to the specific labour-control logic of pass laws.
Step 3: Eliminate Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act
This targeted interracial intimacy, not labour or movement control, so it does not fit the expansion pattern described.
Step 4: Select the 1956 pass law extension
Only the extension of passes to women demonstrates the shift from male-labour regulation to total population surveillance.