Question 1
In a play where a character transforms her accent from working-class to upper-class, other characters begin treating her with new respect despite no change in her intelligence or moral character. What does this scenario best illustrate about social context?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Locate the key contrast
The character's intelligence and moral character stay the same, but treatment from others changes after her accent changes.
Step 2: Connect to social context theory
The content explains that accent functions as a social shorthand others use to judge value, often unfairly and without proof of actual ability.
Step 3: Distinguish perception from reality
Since nothing about her actual abilities changed, the shift in treatment must be about others' perception rather than any real transformation of worth.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
This matches the choice “Perception of a person's worth can shift purely through altered speech, not through actual change”, which names perception-based judgement shifting without underlying change.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Rule out this choice
The choice “Judgement is based on genuine perception of ability rather than superficial markers of speech” claims judgement is genuine, but the scenario shows treatment changed without any real change in ability, contradicting this.
Step 2: Rule out this choice
Institutions in the content reward performance of expected accent and manners, not verified proof of true origin, so C is false.
Step 3: Rule out this choice
The scenario shows accent has a strong effect on treatment; D directly contradicts the premise of the question.
Step 4: Confirm this choice
Only B correctly identifies that perception, not verified reality, drove the change in treatment.
Question 2
A student writes: 'The maid has a working-class accent.' According to the guidance on avoiding a common analytical mistake, what should be added to turn this into effective analysis?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Recall the common mistake warning
The content warns against simply noting an accent without connecting it to an effect on the plot or another character's judgement.
Step 2: Apply the fix
The fix requires explaining what assumption the accent causes others to make and what consequence follows from that assumption.
Step 3: Match to options
Only one option describes adding an assumption and its consequence rather than unrelated description or definition.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The choice “The specific assumption her accent triggers in another character and the consequence that follows” matches the required fix precisely.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Rule out this choice
Clothing description does not address the specific mistake about accent lacking a stated consequence.
Step 2: Rule out this choice
Listing other characters with the same accent does not explain any effect or judgement, so it fails the requirement.
Step 3: Rule out this choice
A general definition of class ignores the specific character and consequence the content demands.
Step 4: Confirm this choice
B directly supplies the missing assumption-and-consequence link the content requires.
13 more questions in this topic
Pick this up in your Library: it holds the whole topic, notes, cheatsheet and questions. Your answers here are kept on this device.