Question 1
A student argues 'homework should be reduced' and supports it with: 'A famous basketball player once said he never liked homework.' Comment on why this is weak evidence.No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Identify the claim
The point is that homework should be reduced, and the evidence offered is a celebrity's personal opinion about homework.
Step 2: Apply the expert test
The content explains that an expert voice is only strong evidence if the person is actually knowledgeable about that specific topic.
Step 3: Interpret the mismatch
A basketball player has expertise in sport, not in education policy or student wellbeing, so his opinion carries little weight here.
Step 4: Select the answer
The evidence fails because it is not from someone with relevant expertise on the topic, matching the choice “The basketball player is not an expert on education, so the opinion does not really support the point.”.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Eliminate length claim
Length is not what determines strong or weak evidence; short evidence can be strong if it is specific and relevant.
Step 2: Eliminate the rule claim
There is no rule that certain people can never be quoted; the issue is relevance of expertise, not who is speaking.
Step 3: Eliminate the drama claim
The content warns against judging evidence by how dramatic it sounds, so this is the wrong reasoning entirely.
Step 4: Confirm correct option
Only the choice “The basketball player is not an expert on education, so the opinion does not really support the point.” correctly identifies the mismatch between the speaker's expertise and the topic being discussed.
Question 2
Which piece of evidence is a fact, according to the distinction taught between facts, examples, and expert voices?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answer
Correct!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Identify the categories
The three evidence types are fact, example, and expert voice, each defined by what it looks like.
Step 2: Apply the fact definition
A fact is something true and checkable, not tied to one specific case or one person's opinion.
Step 3: Interpret the statement
The plastic bag decomposition statement is a general, checkable truth, matching the definition of a fact exactly.
Step 4: Select the answer
The choice “"Plastic bags can take hundreds of years to break down" is a checkable, true statement about the world.” is the fact; the others are an example, an expert voice, and an unsupported opinion.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Eliminate the example
The paper bag statement is a specific case from one school, which fits the definition of an example, not a fact.
Step 2: Eliminate the expert voice
The scientist's statement is an expert opinion, a distinct category from a general checkable fact.
Step 3: Eliminate the vague claim
"Everyone knows" is not checkable and is actually an example of weak, vague evidence, not a fact.
Step 4: Confirm correct option
Only the plastic bag statement is a true, checkable general claim, so the choice “"Plastic bags can take hundreds of years to break down" is a checkable, true statement about the world.” is correct.
12 more questions in this topic
Pick this up in your Library: it holds the whole topic, notes, cheatsheet and questions. Your answers here are kept on this device.