MYP 2 Sciences · Mapping Matter

How pure substances combine

Get started
Free preview 2/14
  1. Question 1

    When iron filings and sulfur powder are mixed together, you can separate the iron using a magnet. After the mixture is strongly heated, the magnet no longer attracts the solid. Which statement best explains this observation?
    No clue? Show me the answer
    Correct answerCorrect!Incorrect
    AA chemical reaction has occurred, forming iron sulfide — a new compound with different properties from either iron or sulfur

    Step-by-step walkthrough

    Choose a solution method

    Method #1Direct Approach

    Step 1: Identify what is being observed

    Before heating, a magnet attracts the iron because it is a free element in a mixture. After heating, the magnet no longer works, meaning the iron's magnetic property has changed.

    Step 2: Apply knowledge of compounds vs. mixtures

    In a mixture, elements keep their own properties — so iron stays magnetic. When a chemical reaction occurs, atoms bond to form a new compound with entirely different properties. Iron sulfide (FeS) is that new compound.

    Step 3: Connect to the Law of Conservation of Mass

    The iron atoms are not destroyed — they are rearranged into a new compound. This is why the mass is conserved but the magnetic property disappears: the iron atoms are now chemically bonded to sulfur atoms.

    Step 4: Select the correct answer

    The correct answer is that a chemical reaction has occurred, forming iron sulfide, a compound with different properties. A compound's properties are not simply a combination of its elements' properties — they are new and different.

    Method #2Process of Elimination

    Step 1: Identify what the question asks

    The question asks why the heated product is no longer magnetic, even though the original mixture contained iron.

    Step 2: Eliminate 'iron atoms have been destroyed'

    The Law of Conservation of Mass states that atoms are never created or destroyed in a chemical reaction — they are only rearranged. So the option saying iron atoms are destroyed is incorrect.

    Step 3: Eliminate 'melted into a dense mixture'

    Melting is a physical change, not a chemical one. A physical change does not alter the chemical properties of iron — melted iron is still iron and would still be magnetic.

    Step 4: Eliminate 'sulfur coating blocks the magnet'

    This explanation is about a physical barrier, but a thin coating of sulfur would not stop a magnet from attracting iron underneath. Also, this does not account for the formation of a new substance.

    Step 5: Select the correct answer

    The remaining option — that a chemical reaction formed iron sulfide with different properties — correctly explains the observation using the concept that compounds have new properties unlike their constituent elements.

  2. Question 2

    A student adds baking soda to vinegar and observes bubbles forming rapidly. Which of the following best explains why this is evidence of a chemical reaction?
    No clue? Show me the answer
    Correct answerCorrect!Incorrect
    ABubbles forming indicates that a gas is being produced, suggesting a new substance has been made

    Step-by-step walkthrough

    Choose a solution method

    Method #1Direct Approach

    Step 1: Identify the observable sign

    The key observation is bubbles forming rapidly where there were no bubbles before. This is one of the recognised signs of a chemical reaction.

    Step 2: Apply knowledge of signs of chemical reactions

    One of the main signs of a chemical reaction is gas being released — bubbles appearing that were not there before indicate a gaseous product has been formed. This means atoms have been rearranged into new substances.

    Step 3: Select the correct answer

    The correct answer is that bubbles indicate gas production, which is evidence that a new substance has been made in a chemical reaction. Baking soda reacting with vinegar produces carbon dioxide gas as a product.

    Method #2Process of Elimination

    Step 1: Identify what is being tested

    The question tests whether students can identify bubbles as evidence of a chemical reaction and explain why they indicate a new substance.

    Step 2: Eliminate 'bubbles always form when two liquids mix'

    This is incorrect — mixing two liquids (such as water and juice) does not automatically produce bubbles. Bubbles only appear when a gas is produced, which is a sign of a chemical reaction.

    Step 3: Eliminate the temperature and dissolving option

    The question describes bubbles, not a temperature drop. Also, dissolving is a physical change — the original substances can be recovered, and no new substance is formed. This option mixes up different concepts.

    Step 4: Eliminate 'bubbles mean boiling'

    Boiling requires extremely high temperatures, and vinegar and baking soda react at room temperature. The bubbles are carbon dioxide gas produced by the reaction, not steam from boiling.

    Step 5: Select the correct answer

    The correct answer is that bubbles indicate a gas has been produced, which is one of the key signs of a chemical reaction occurring and a new substance being formed.

Free preview

12 more questions in this topic

Pick this up in your Library: it holds the whole topic, notes, cheatsheet and questions. Your answers here are kept on this device.