Question 1
A character in a novel must decide whether to report a close friend for cheating on an exam. Which statement best explains why this situation is a genuine moral dilemma rather than a simple right-versus-wrong choice?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!
IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Locate the conflicting values
The scenario involves loyalty to a friend on one side and fairness to other students on the other side.
Step 2: Apply the definition of dilemma
A moral dilemma exists when two values that both matter pull in opposite directions, not when one option is obviously wrong.
Step 3: Check for a clean option
Neither reporting nor staying silent fully satisfies both loyalty and fairness, which is the hallmark of a real dilemma.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The option naming the loyalty-versus-fairness conflict captures why this is a dilemma, not just a hard task.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Reject certainty framing
The option claiming the character will definitely report the friend removes the conflict entirely, so it cannot explain a dilemma.
Step 2: Reject external timing
Discovery by the teacher is an external event, not the reason the situation involves conflicting values.
Step 3: Reject difficulty alone
Time pressure alone does not make something a moral dilemma; many easy decisions are also made quickly.
Step 4: Confirm remaining option
Only the loyalty-versus-fairness explanation matches the definition of a dilemma given in the content.
Question 2
In a short story, a character who witnesses a classmate being bullied considers three options: intervening directly, telling a teacher, or staying silent to avoid risk. Which value conflict best captures the core of this dilemma?No clue? Show me the answer
Correct answerCorrect!IncorrectStep-by-step walkthrough
Choose a solution method
Method #1Direct reasoningStep 1: Name the character's pressures
The character feels pulled to protect someone vulnerable while also fearing personal consequences of getting involved.
Step 2: Match to value categories
Care for others and personal safety are two of the obligations that pull characters in different directions in dilemmas.
Step 3: Test the fit
Each option, intervening, telling a teacher, or staying silent, trades protection for risk in a different way.
Step 4: Confirm the answer
The tension between protecting the vulnerable and avoiding personal risk best describes this specific dilemma.
Method #2Process of eliminationStep 1: Reject punishment focus
Whether the bully faces punishment is a consequence, not the value conflict driving the witness's decision.
Step 2: Reject rule-following framing
The dilemma is not simply about following or ignoring policy; it is about competing personal obligations.
Step 3: Reject factual question
Whether bullying breaks school rules is a factual matter, not a moral conflict between two important values.
Step 4: Confirm remaining option
Only the care-versus-self-protection option accurately names the competing values in the bystander's situation.
13 more questions in this topic
Pick this up in your Library: it holds the whole topic, notes, cheatsheet and questions. Your answers here are kept on this device.